How to Get Two Property Income Streams and Why Negative Gearing is NOT So Stupid.

Expert Advice: by Lindy Lear

Negative Gearing has got itself a bad name in many property circles. I read many articles stating that negative gearing is stupid. So let’s look at what negative gearing means for an investor trying to grow wealth through property. In my experience it does not need to cost $100’s of dollars per week to support a negatively geared property, it may cost you a little or it may actually put money in your pocket.

Why would an investor knowingly buy a property that will run at a loss because the income (rent) does not cover all the expenses? That does sound stupid! However smart investors know that there are hidden benefits of buying a property using negative gearing. It does not have to cost you money!

Claiming the loss  

All property losses (income – expenses - depreciation = loss) can be claimed back against your general income. Australia’s tax system recognises property investing is a business. That means as a property investor using negative gearing you can pay less tax .Why is our tax system so generous?   In Australia, our government has not followed the social housing path like other countries. Our population keeps growing so our housing shortage increases.  Someone has to fill the shortfall and it is the investors who meet the demand instead of the government.  So think of negative gearing as the incentive offered to make this an attractive business opportunity.

Second income stream

With negative gearing, you can get a second income stream as the tax benefit or tax refund can be added to your rental income. The tenant and the taxman can be paying most or all of the property expenses. It does not all have to come out of your hip pocket.

This is usually overlooked by the critics of negative gearing. Yet this extra tax benefit or refund  can be an effective  way  to manage the holding costs of property as you grow your portfolio. From my experience the less the holding costs the faster you can grow your portfolio. It is all about the cashflow rather than the gearing!

Negative Gearing and Positive Cashflow

This is the best secret that I discovered on my property journey.  When the tax benefit is added to the rental income, the total amount received can often exceed the actual expenses incurred, resulting in a negatively geared property with a positive cashflow.  This is where negative gearing comes to the forefront – the tenant and the taxman pay for the property and you still come out in front!

I prefer to look at the after tax weekly cashflow outcome of a property rather than the before tax negative gearing outcome when assessing a property as a suitable investment. It is not just the income from the rent that is important. Other factors such as the amount you borrow, interest rates, your tax rate, the level of property expenses (such as maintenance) and the amount of depreciation claimed can make a huge difference to your bottom line cashflow. It is negative gearing that allows these factors to be taken into account. Maybe negative gearing is not so stupid after all, especially if it puts money into your pocket as an investor.

Negative Gearing is not a dirty word

The reality is most investors have to use leverage (ie borrowing other people’s money) to get started. Building a large asset base for future passive income is more about  buying quality growth assets  than about short term rental yields.  Many investors need the benefits of negative gearing to subsidize their portfolio’s holding costs.  The hidden benefits and incentives offered by negative gearing may give you a more “positive “outcome than you first thought. As rents grow over time, as the property goes up in value, and the expenses decrease (eg interest rates going down) your return on investment (ROI) grows as well. Negative gearing is a useful tool in growing a portfolio not a dreaded disease.

My goal in this article is not to take sides and say that negative gearing is the best strategy. My aim is to help investors find the right strategy and understand how negative gearing can work to benefit them.  I just want to make sure that investors know both sides of the story. For those wanting to know more please call me and request ‘Demystifying Positive and Negative Gearing’ and ‘Cashflow Positive Properties – Fact or Fiction’ past articles.

Happy Investing!

Lindy Lear is a successful property investor who had a late start into investing, yet has grown her portfolio to eight properties in three years. She is a qualified property advisor and general manager of Rocket Property Group, and she won the Reader’s Choice Award in 2009 for Property Investment Advisor of the Year. Lindy is passionate about helping others realise their goals through investing in property, and can be contacted at 02 8012 9669 or visit

To read more Expert Advice articles by Lindy, click here

Disclaimer: while due care is taken, the viewpoints expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Your Investment Property.

With interest rates at their lowest for more than 50 years, there are some great rates available. The best thing to do is to compare rates from all the lenders. Let us help take the leg work out of doing this - Compare Home Loans now

Top Suburbs : westbrook , balga , south brisbane , coburg north , the basin

go back
  • Rocket Property Group says on 31/10/2013 02:16:03 PM

    Lindy Lear will be happy to answer your questions through this forum thread!

  • Keith says on 05/03/2015 03:55:45 AM

    A simple inequality mathematical relationship can be used to proof negative gearing can never be better than not having negative gearing at all!

    What a ridiculous article..."add tax savings to your rental income"? Do me a favor: don't ever give financial advice again!