Common misconceptions about investing in property: Part 2

Expert Advice by Lindy Lear

This month I want to follow on from last month’s ABC of Investing with more common misconceptions around borrowing money for investing and chasing high yields so that more budding investors understand how to start investing in an easy, stress free and low-risk way.

Misconception 5: Avoid paying LMI at all costs
Many budding investors decide to use a 20% deposit just so they can avoid paying LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) in the belief avoiding paying this premium is saving them money. However experienced investors look at LMI differently and see it as just a cost of doing business. That 20% deposit may mean you can leverage into two properties by using 10% deposits only. By accepting LMI  investors can afford to stretch their cash or equity further and buy more property using OPM (other people’s money ie banks) to achieve their goals sooner. They look for banks that capitalise the LMI into the loan (so they end up with a loan of approx. 92%), and as these loan costs are tax deductible they are saving money as well!

Misconception 6: Borrowing 100% or more from the banks is best
A good mortgage broker will assess your borrowing capacity and also help you set up the best loan structure for you. When you have other property (eg your own home) with potential equity,  banks can offer to finance 100% or more using your own home or other property as security. This is called cross-collateralisation. Many investors jump at this option because it seems the easiest, as the banks lend you all funds for the new investment property including the stamp duty and legal costs. How nice of the bank!  However having all your loans “crossed” together may limit your ability to continue growing your portfolio in the future, and leaves you with no buffer for running everyday property expenses.
When I started investing I preferred the option of utilising my equity in a different way and set up an offset account (you could also us a Line of Credit account) and I shared the love around by using many different banks for my investment loans. This way I avoided having my home and my properties secured together.  It allowed me to claim the interest as tax deductions, it left me with a buffer in my offset account to cover the everyday expenses and allowed me to sleep at night! Most importantly I was able to grow my portfolio faster.

Misconception 7: Chasing high yielding property  to get the best cashflow outcomes
As an investor we all want to have a property that pays for itself or in investing terms, property that gives a positive cashflow outcome.  I still find that many investors equate high rental yields (eg 8%+) as a guaranteed way to achieve a positive cashflow outcome. However this may not always be the case as the gross rental yield does not tell the whole story. The net cashflow after all expenses are taken into account can result in a negative cashflow outcome,  particularly if the property is older without any non-cash deductions (eg depreciation) and if a realistic maintenance and repair budget is not allowed for. Many investors get a nasty surprise when one major repair takes up all their expected cashflow for the year.

I have found that there is an easier way to achieve a positive cashflow outcome. If you select newer properties that have significant depreciation allowances for up to 40 years, that are less likely to have maintenance and repairs in the first 10 years, they will give you maximum tax deductions and a big tax refund cheque as a second source of income to supplement the rent. Even with yields from 5% - 6% your property can have a positive cashflow outcome. So not only have you more properties to choose from in the market, you can end up with more cash in your pocket and forget about chasing only high yielding property. Of course you do want to add potential for capital growth to you property selection criteria. Yields alone will not give you the passive income you may desire!

Please register on our if you would like to ask me any questions. I would love to be able to help you on your property journey.

Lindy Lear is a successful property investor who had a late start into investing, yet she built a portfolio of eight properties in just three years. She is a qualified property advisor and general manager of Rocket Property Group, and she won the Reader’s Choice Award in 2009, 2012 & 2013 for Property Investment Advisor of the Year. Lindy is passionate about helping others realise their goals through investing in property, and can be contacted on Ph: 1300 850 038 or visit

To read more Expert Advice articles by Lindy, click here

Disclaimer: while due care is taken, the viewpoints expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Your Investment Property.

Whether you are looking to buy your first home, move home, refinance, or invest in property, a mortgage broker can help. Access loans from all the major lenders, get help with paperwork – plus there is no charge for this service. Get help from a local mortgage broker

Top Suburbs : wentworthville , torrensville , keperra , marrickville , chermside

go back
  • willegalley212 says on 09/10/2014 07:58:05 PM

    This question is very intersting which makes one aware regarding the misconceptions in the property investment.

  • says on 28/10/2014 06:10:33 PM

    Paying LMI is a clue that you are investing at increased potential risk level. Doing so you need a clear strategy to reduce your debt leverage thereby reducing your potential future risk.

    Banks are happy to let you use Lenders Mortgage Insurance because it protects them, however it doesn't protect you, the borrower what so ever. In fact the mere fact you are using LMI means things are tight, proceed carefully.