Likelihood of negative gearing, CGT changes increases

By |
The likelihood of changes to tax arrangements such as negative gearing and the current capital gains tax discount seems to be increasing, with both the Federal Government and the Opposition revealing plans to overhaul the current system.

While speculation has mounted in recent months that changes to the arrangements could be made as the government looks to reform the national taxation system, last weekend gave the best indication yet as to what the two major parties are proposing.

Speaking at the NSW ALP conference over the weekend, Opposition lead Bill Shorten announced that under a Labor government negative gearing would only be applicable to investments in new housing.

Shorten claimed the change was aimed at improving housing affordability.

“We're doing this because 30 years ago, houses cost around 3.2 times average income — today it's 6.5 times average income,” Shorten said.

“Labor will help level the playing field for first home buyers competing with investors and we will put the great Australian dream back within the reach of the working and middle-class Australians who have been priced out of the housing market for too long,” he said.

But Master Builders of Australia (MBA) chief executive Wilhelm Harnisch said his organisation believed Labor was folding to a populist, but incorrect opinion of negative gearing.

“Our concern is that Labor’s policy is a populist response to those who demonise housing and negative gearing as primary cause of our fiscal and social problems. Investing in new private rental housing is not evil,” Harnisch said.

“The private rental market is a critical supplement to the public and social housing rental sectors.

The private rental market also provides a valuable role in supplementing the retirement income strategy for mum and dads on low and middle incomes. Housing is an asset class just as shares and just as shares, interest deductibility in investment housing should remain as a tax feature,” he said

While Shorten has publicly stated the Opposition’s stance on negative gearing, the Government’s position is somewhat less clear.

According to a report in the Australian Financial Review over the weekend, the Treasury department is currently considering two options, either a cap on the number of properties that can be negatively geared or a cap on the amount that can be claimed as a deduction through negative gearing.

Though the specifics of the Government’s proposed changes aren’t yet known, Harnisch said the MBA hoped they would be of benefit to everyday investors and the economy.

“What we are looking for from both major parties in the lead up to the Federal Election are policies that add to economic growth, create jobs and enhances the positive role that housing can play and that will at the same time improve the ability of mums and dads make their contribution by providing rental housing and at the same time look after their own retirement strategies,” he said.

The possibility of an overhaul of negative gearing has attracted the most attention, but a victory for the Labor Party at the next election could have even further implications for investors, with Shorten also announcing his party would reduce the current capital gains tax discount for investment properties.

Under Labor, the current discount of 50% would be reduced to 25%.

"It cannot be rationally argued anything else but with a capital gains tax subsidy of 50 per cent, that the whole system is accessibly distorted and overly generous in favour of income from capital instead of income from earnings," Shorten said.

"We will grandfather existing arrangements for those properties so that investors who have invested under the current tax law will not be disadvantaged by the change and a prospective change.”

That proposal has also been met with criticism, with Housing Industry Association chief executive industry policy and media Graham Wolfe claiming it would worsen, rather than improve affordability.

“Yesterday’s announcement by the Opposition that it intends to halve the capital gains discount on investment properties will, in our view, not achieve these objectives. Reducing the CGT discount, which is an important measure to recognise the net present value of an asset, will push investment away from Australia’s housing sector,” Wolfe said.

“The Henry Tax review rightly concluded that addressing the supply side impediments to new housing had to be the priority focus, including: reducing stamp duty; alleviating land supply restrictions; addressing onerous planning controls; and delivering housing infrastructure in an equitable and timely manner,” he said.
 
 

Whether you are looking to buy your first home, move home, refinance, or invest in property, a mortgage broker can help. Access loans from all the major lenders, get help with paperwork – plus there is no charge for this service. Get help from a local mortgage broker

Top Suburbs : nundah , nightcliff , gladesville , mt lawley , newcastle

go back
Comments
  • Chris says on 15/02/2016 03:42:25 PM

    Changes to the negative gearing arrangements will negatively affect everyone. Tenants, owner occupier, Overseas investment, Mums & Dads with one or two investment properties who have planned for this as retirement income. Is the government trying to force investment into the share market, with property off the menu it is the only other option. Surely putting everyones eggs into that basket it unwise! Who will buy these properties that investors own that are now month balled when they unable to produce income? The loss will be felt by all, unfortunately mostly by the people who have worked hard to setup for retirement. Super is good, but surely it should not be the only option. Or are we simply trying to sell our country quicker than we already do?

  • Mott Scorrison says on 15/02/2016 03:56:42 PM

    Why should a firsthome owner be treated any different to an investor owner who can write off his interest as an expense against his tax. If the investor can minimise his tax so should the (first) houseowner for a limited period of time say 5-10 years. The investor can write off his expense forever as long as he owes money. Not reasonable or fair

  • Rakish says on 15/02/2016 06:48:50 PM




    You cant be serious Chris, “Changes to the negative gearing arrangements will negatively affect everyone.” that is a most spurious claim.

    Tenants – How? As has been repeatably shown negative gearing or more correctly the removal of DOES NOT increase rents.
    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2071570-saul-eslake-affordable-housing-inquiry-submission.html

    Owner Occupiers – Are you claiming that negative gearing causes properties to be overvalued?

    Mums & Dads – Your kidding right 80% of investment property debt is held by the top 40% of income earners, not to mention the distortion of stats by people using super to speculate on property. While yes they may be 'Mum & Dads' they are not the quintessential 'Aussie Battler'

    “Is the government trying to force investment into the share market, with property off the menu it is the only other option.”

    Are you trying to claim that you can't “invest” in property unless it is negatively geared?

    "Who will buy these properties that investors own that are now month balled when they unable to produce income?" ....simple other investors who don't need to negatively gear or owner occupiers.

    Seriously with over 90% of negatively geared properties being pre-exisiting housing, changing it to new builds only may potentially see a increasing in housing supply. Hopefully a generation of Australians will not get saddled with a ridiculous amount of housing debt.

    I'm sorry if my repose to you has come of strong but its the opinions from people like you that I just can't understand. Clearly you seem to be someone that doesn't want to sponge of others and you wish to provide for your own retirement, but can't you see how something like negative gearing is a massive tax distortion that is detrimental to the economy as a whole?. I will admit I myself hold a few investment properties (Well one was for capital gain so 'speculation'), but negative gearing simply creates an intensive for people to pour money into an unproductive asset.

View 8 more comment(s)

Get help financing your investment



Do you need help finding the right loan for your investment?


When investing in property, it is important to make sure that you not only have the lowest available rate that you can get, but also have the correct loan features for your needs.

Just fill in a few details below and we'll then arrange for a local expert Aussie Mortgage Broker to contact you and work out what features or types of loans are right for your needs. We'll even help with the paperwork. Plus, our mortgage broking service is at no cost to you.

Why does  Aussie need your personal information?    How does Aussie keep your information secure?
Aussie is a trade mark of AHL Investments Pty Ltd. Aussie is a partly-owned subsidiary of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence 234945.
© 2016 AHL Investments Pty Ltd ABN 27 105 265 861 Australian Credit Licence 246786.

 
How soon would you like a mortgage?
What is your Annual Household Income i $
Do you currently own any Investment Properties?
Do you own your own residence?
How much equity do you have in all your current properties?
First Name
Last Name
Where do you live?
What number can we reach you on?
E-mail address
We value your privacy and treat all your information seriously - you can check out our privacy policy here